Serbia

Go to general description

In 2003, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) became the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro - a loose federation giving each of the participating member states the right to break away from the state union after a 3-year period following a referendum.

On 21 May 2006 Montenegro had a referendum on independence which was supported by a majority of 55.5% and declared itself independent on 3 June 2006. On 5 June 2006 Serbia – in accordance with the Constitutional Charter of the State Union Article 60 – declared that it was the successor state to the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro.

In October 2006 Serbia adopted its current Constitution.

Generally, Serbia is a republic, secular state based on the rule of law exercised through free and direct elections, principles of democracy, independent judiciary and commitment to European principles and values.

The system of government is based on the division of powers into legislative (National Assembly), executive (Government) and judiciary (Courts) branches. The Constitution also secures a broad spectrum of human rights and freedoms, prohibits discrimination, promotes gender equality, protection of national minorities etc.

Serbia has two autonomous provinces found in the North (Vojvodina) and in the South (Kosovo and Metohija – see the special section below). Serbia is divided into 29 districts and 190 municipalities (opštinas, singular – opština). The Serbian language and Cyrillic script is the official.

The legislative power belongs to the National Assembly which consists of 250 deputies elected for four years by direct elections by secret ballot.

It inter alia adopts and amends the Constitution, enacts laws and other general acts, calls for referenda, decides changes on borders of Serbia, ratifies international contracts and gives previous approval for the statutes of autonomous provinces. Also, it elects the Government and appoints and dismisses judges, public prosecutors and a number of government officials.

Decisions are as a general rule made by means of majority vote at the session at which the majority of the deputies are present, but a number of listed issues must be decided by means of majority of all deputies.

The right to propose laws belongs to every deputy, the Government, assemblies of autonomous provinces or at least 30,000 voters. Also, the Civic Defender (resembling an “Ombudsman”) and National Bank of Serbia may propose laws falling within their competence. Referenda shall be held upon the request of the majority of all deputies or at least 100,000 voters. Proposals to amend the Constitution may be submitted by at least one third of the total number of deputies of the National Assembly, the President of the Republic, the Government or at least 150,000 voters, and shall be adopted by a two-third majority of the total number of deputies of the National Assembly.

The President may dissolve the National Assembly upon proposal of the Government.

The President is elected in direct elections for a period of five years. No one can be elected President more than twice. The President inter alia proposes candidates for the Prime Minister and promulgates laws. If the President refuses to promulgate a law passed by the National Assembly, he shall return it with a written explanation. If the National Assembly decides to vote again, the law shall be adopted by the majority vote from the total number of deputies.

The President may be dismissed for the violation of the Constitution upon the decision of the National Assembly. The Constitutional Court shall decide on the violation of the Constitution.

Executive power is held by the Government, which consists of the Prime Minister, one or more Vice Presidents and Ministers. It executes laws, adopts regulations for the purpose of law enforcement, proposes laws to the National Assembly etc.

The Prime Minister is proposed by the President to the National Assembly, which – simultaneously – votes for the Prime Minister, members of the Government and the Government’s Programme.

The National Assembly may pass a vote of no confidence in the Government, after which either a new Government shall be formed or the National Assembly dissolved.

Judicial power belongs to the courts. The courts comprise the Constitutional Court, courts of regular competence (138 municipal courts, 30 district courts and the Supreme Court of Serbia) and courts of special competence (17 commercial courts and The High Commercial Court).

Justices for the Constitutional Court (15 justices) are appointed for 9 years. Other judges have permanent tenure, except for the first time elected (3 years). They all enjoy independence and immunity.

The Constitutional Court protects constitutionality, legality and human and minority rights and freedoms. They decide on inter alia compliance of laws and ratified international treaties with the Constitution, conflicts of jurisdiction and electoral disputes.

The High Judicial Council (11 members) provides and guarantees independence and autonomy of courts and judges. The Council inter alia appoints and relieves judges. Also, the State Prosecutors Council (11 members) provides for and guarantees the autonomy of the Public Prosecutors and Deputy Public Prosecutors.

Posted: November 2007.

ODIHR Legal Reviews, Assessments

Variety of useful resources and tools prepared by ODIHR to support legal reform in OSCE participating States. It includes legal reviews of draft and exisiting national legislation and assessments of legislative process.

Opinions

2026-03-06

Following ODIHR’s Urgent Opinion on Draft Amendments to Several Pieces of Election-Related Legislation (15 April 2024) which aimed to address a limited number of ODIHR recommendations from its Final Report on the observation of the 17 December 2023 parliamentary elections in Serbia, a revised set of draft amendments to three legislative pieces was prepared by the National Assembly Service. On 2 February, ODIHR was requested to provide its expert legal opinion on these drafts.
The 2024 Urgent Opinion had concluded that the initial set of proposed amendments were an overall welcome step towards addressing certain ODIHR recommendations in the legislation, but highlighted that some of the provisions could benefit from further consideration prior to adoption as specified in the recommendations put forward in the Opinion.
In preparation of this opinion, ODIHR sought comments from various national stakeholders. The resulting explanations and suggestions are noted throughout the Opinion. Representatives of the ruling party indicated that the current draft texts are preliminary working documents intended to launch the amendment process and facilitate broad consultations, whereas other interlocutors asserted procedural irregularities, lack of transparency, and absence of an inclusive consultation process. ODIHR expresses hope that these preliminary drafts will result in a comprehensive reform of election legislation and ODIHR’s recommendation to initiate such reform, well in advance of the next elections, through an inclusive consultative process that includes relevant stakeholders, such as civil society organizations and opposition political parties, and builds broad political consensus, still stands.
Certain of the revised draft amendments reviewed fully or partially address some of ODIHR’s 2023 recommendations, in particular those calling for provision of mandatory training of election officials, repealing of restrictions on signing candidate lists, extending the right to rectification of deficiencies in nomination documents, further defining the legal criteria for national minority status of candidate lists, and setting a short deadline for Constitutional Court decisions and extending the period for holding repeat elections. In this regard, ODIHR reiterates the overall positive step that the draft amendments represent for improving the electoral legislation.
However, ODIHR notes that certain revisions to the draft amendments represent a step back from the earlier version assessed in its 2024 Urgent Opinion, including the removal of some proposals that ODIHR had clearly positively assessed and/or concluded that they had fully addressed a 2023 recommendation, such as the proposed concrete deadline for the Constitutional Court to adjudicate election-related cases. Further, the 2026 revised draft amendments address very few of the recommendations put forward in ODIHR’s 2024 Urgent Opinion to bring the draft provisions further in line with its 2023 recommendations and international electoral standards. At the same time, ODIHR acknowledges that some of the revisions to the draft text strengthen the provisions to a certain extent, while also highlighting that several new proposals raise additional concerns.

Show all 16 more documents
Show all 3 more documents

Legislation

Constitution

Variety of useful resources and tools prepared by ODIHR to support legal reform in OSCE participating States. It includes legal reviews of draft and exisiting national legislation and assessments of legislative process.

Show all 9 more documents

Legislation

Criminal codes

National legislative acts on a range of human dimension issues. It offers access to full-text documents, as well as summaries of and excerpts from national constitutions, primary and secondary legislation and case-law from across the OSCE region.

Show all 7 more documents

Legislation

Primary and Secondary

National legislative acts on a range of human dimension issues. It offers access to full-text documents, as well as summaries of and excerpts from national constitutions, primary and secondary legislation and case-law from across the OSCE region.

Show all 132 more documents

International standards

Case-law

Case law subline. Status of Ratification of the Main International Human Rights Treaties, Conventions and other instruments. International Case-law for selected topics.

Back to top